It has been only four months since we got our The Form 1+ and started dabbling in the SLA technology. We have decided to sell our 3D printer to another company and to end the frustrating struggle with the light-cured resin which we never managed to harness. What was the reason of our failure? The device which did not print as it should? Maybe our ignorance and lack of skill? Here is a short account of the struggle and an attempt to answer the question: Is The Form 1+ and 3D printing with resins for everyone…?

When in mid-September 2015 I published the article about our first experiences with The Form 1+ I was already aware of a number of problems that would haunt us in the coming months. The lack of reproducibility, tearing of prints and the expensive consumables made us increasingly reluctant to any prospect of starting up the 3D printer, and at some point we would simply procrastinate 3D printing with The Form 1+, justifying it with other duties.

Does this mean, then, that The Form 1+ is hopeless and impossible to work with? Nothing of the sort. In terms of functionality is the perfect device. After the last software update (PreForm), to start 3D printing a model is basically as easy as to select the resin type and the layer height (needs to be done every time we start the program). Then click on the new print creator button… and click the start button to print. Everything is fully automated and the novice users should have absolutely no problems with the start of work.

The Form 1 01

The problem, however, lies elsewhere… While the majority of the models are printed without any problems, there would sooner or later be a model which The Form 1+ can not handle. This inability usually consists in the fact that the printout tears up during work, or in the best case scenario it has some holes in it. Why is that, and why some models come out better than others – this is the thing we did not get to discover and understand in such a short time (four months!).

All the bad things that you have to constantly pay attention to…

The issues which have a negative impact on the quality of The Form 1+’s 3D printing include:

  • the dirt on the mirror controlling the laser beam – unfortunately the structure of the 3D printer has a flaw – the opening through which the ball screw controls the build plate in the Z axis lets dirt from the outside into the device; whereas the smallest speck of dust on the mirror results in that at the particular spot the resin is not properly cured, because the laser beam is distorted; of course it may happen that the dust gets to a spot where the current model is not printed and nothing bad would happen, but… it is utterly unpredictable – there is now way to know whether and where the dust would settle on the mirror and whether the model would be printed correctly.
  • dirty resin – from retrospect, we can say that until the first printout got torn up, The Form 1+ would print everything without any problems; the reasons for tearing of the printouts are described below, here I would only like to focus on the consequences of the phenomenon; the printouts are torn in various ways and in various places – curiously, it never occurred that a printout would break off the build platform; the tearing always took place somewhere in the middle of the model itself;
    The Form 1 22
    when the model gets torn, some of it remains on the platform, whereas some of it is left stuck to the container’s surface in the form of a flat “blob”; in order to remove it you need a special scraper made from some elastic material (I would use a silicone scraper used to do spreading grout on the tiles); the scraper is plunged in resin and the hardened piece of the printout is gently prised, which then fished out from the container;
    The Form 1 14
    later we comb through the resin in search of the fragments of the hardened material, which we take out as well; a special “comb” printed beforehand is useful at this point;
    The Form 1 36
    it sounds nice and east – unfortunately we are talking about resin, which is a thick, sticky and difficult to remove from objects which it touches;

    Fragment stacji do postprocessingu z wyraźnymi plamami po żywicy, możliwymi do usunięcia tylko przy pomocy alkoholu izopropylowego

    A fragment of the postprocessing station with distinct resin spots, possible to remove only with isopropyl alcohol

    all the tools we used to remove the remainders of resin printouts (the scraper and the comb) are covered with resin which has to be wiped off with paper or tissues; to make things complicated, once they are wiped, there may be some pieces of paper left on them, which got stuck to the sticky resin; therefore, after the work is done they too need to be cleaned with isopropyl alcohol;

    and now for the most interesting thing – before the printout remainders are fished out, the scraper and the comb first need to be thoroughly cleaned – otherwise the particles of dust which had settled on the tools will contaminate the resin and spoil our next printout

  • varied resistance of the resin depending on the positioning of the model on the platform and/or its amounts – since the laser beam cures the resin all the way through each layer of the model gets stuck to the base of the container, which is why after curing the platform is raised and the printout is broken off the container base; this means the resin is constantly moving; once the printout is big enough to start emerging from the resin, the stirring resin starts to begins to affect the printout and to distort it slightly, or in extreme cases causing its tearing from the supports;
    The Form 1 31
    in the months we used the device we noticed that the number of the models we print, or the way they are positioned towards the build platform or towards each other, influences their quality; unfortunately, we never learned how to control it?
  • imperfect postprocessing – after the print is completed it should be rinsed in isopropyl alcohol; this is done in three steps: dipping in the first tank for 2 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of drying and another dip in the second tank for 8 minutes; the isopropyl bath is meant to cure and groom the printed the model – unfortunately, if you keep it in the alcohol too long the model starts to shrink;
    The Form 1 21
    if you print a figurine or other gadget – this is not an issue; if you print a detail on the layer of 0.025 mm, where all the microns count, such a “rough”postprocessing, is a silly solution; it takes a lot of experience and accuracy; sometimes it is simply better to accept the fact that a given piece will simply not come out right on The Form 1+ or its default tools…

Why do the printouts tear?

The answer to this question is in fact the key to success. I can admit it straight away – we do not know! We have a number of suspitions, which in most cases turn into certainty – unfortunately in 9 cases out of 10 it occurs to us only in retrospect. We can not predict the problems – or prevent them. It takes many attempts and time. To put it shortly – The Form 1+ (and The Form 2 probably as well) require some training.

The Form 1 33

When you start working with a light-curing resin 3D printer better forget everything you learned in other technologies – FDM in our case. Nothing is the same – there is no common ground. In fact, the only thing that connects stereolithography and FDM is the fact that both are called 3D printing, and that the end result of both processes is the creation of three-dimensional object. And yes, the fact that both technologies use the STL files.
The rest is completely different and we have to learn everything from scratch.
What we lacked was the patience and willingness to invest money in further bottles of resin. It must be emphasized – learning to print on Form 1+ is expensive. The cost of resin (which is several times more expensive than the filament for the FDM 3D printers) should be appended with the cost of the resin container (which needs replacing every 2-3 litres; also when changing the type of resin we need to use a new container).

But coming back to the question – why do the printouts tear, here is a list of potential answers:

  • printout badly oriented towards the build platform – in 3D printing with light-cured resins, the models must be must be turned at an angle of approx. 30 degrees with respect to the table/the resin surface; the software does it automatically, however, we have noticed that it does so according to some rather general algorithms, not because for example “it analysed the design and oriented in the most optimal way“;

    interestingly, we were able to print 2-3 printouts oriented at 90° to the table (just like in the FDM), but majority of such attempts ended in failure; nevertheless, we assume there is a possibility that the PreForm can get it wrong, and the printout will get badly oriented by default, which, in the context of the abovementioned problems with different resin resistance, depending on the placement pf the model on the platform, may lead to its tearing
  • badly generated supports – too weak, not densely or properly arranged, the supports may cause the printout to get torn off; as in the case of proper orienting, here too we do not trust the PreForm; in some cases if not for our intervention in the model and an addition of more supports, the printout would have not come out right
  • dirty mirror, dirty resin or the compilations of all mentioned problems

The Form 1 32


The Form 1+ is a very interesting 3D printer, which is capable of providing high quality printouts – however, the road to mastering the art of printing with it a long and bumpy one. Perhaps the most deceptive things in the device are its use and software. Working with The Form 1+ makes you feel like it is a device which is easiest to use in the world. Even the prostprocessing seems like an interesting experience (though stinking with isopropyl). Unfortunately, the more you get into it, the more complicated it becomes, and the user is forced to analyse further failures and to draw conclusions from them.

At some point we decided to terminate the services of 3D printing and thereby the further work on figuring out the nuances of printing with The Form 1+ became unfounded. Our decision was not connected with the 3D printer itself, it derived from the cessation of the 3D printing services. Printing with light-cured resins, as art for art’s sake, did not seem to be sufficiently attractive in order to continue to spend time and money on it.

We are full of admiration for ou friend Maciek Strzała of polish company Formakers, who mastered the art of printing with The Form 1+, as evidenced by the extraordinary 3D models which he presents during fairs and events. Maciek proves that if you really want to get good printouts with The Form 1+, you can get them – we did not have the energy and the faith. Another thing is that we decided to devote our time to other projects, but that is a different story…

One way or another – if you intend to invest in The Form 1+ or The Form 2, remember: patience, humility and the money for more and more bottles of resin are essential. This is not FDM – this is something else…

Paweł Ślusarczyk
CEO of 3D Printing Center. Has over 15 years' experience in buisiness, gained in IT, advertising and polygraphy. Part of 3D printing industry since 2013.

Comments are closed.

You may also like